« A nice guy in nice guy clothing | Main | A quick and easy way to sort out most of the fake ads »

Condoms: safer sex or safer psyche?

I had an interesting conversation with a potential fuckee recently, talking about safer sex and in what circumstances each of us requires condoms to be in play. Earlier in the evening, while comparing notes on previous experiences, he told me that he'd met up with a couple of men he met on CL and that in the case of the one who wanted to give him a blow job, he had insisted on a condom for that. This is well within the range of normal safer sex precautions, so it didn't stand out particularly until we were talking specifics about what we might do.

Naturally, I assumed that his expectation would be to use condoms for fellatio, so you can imagine my surprise when he told me, "Of course, I'd be happiest not using condoms for oral."

Whoa! What?

Now, this is also in the realm of what I consider normal safer sex precautions, but I was struck by the fact that he would insist upon it with one person and not with another, particularly because, if I may brag, I get around a bit, so it's not like I'm a no-risk lay. So what was going on there? Maybe this other fellow was also very slutty? I asked. No, he was more of a shut-in.

This left me with the most obvious (to me) conclusion that in this case, the condom would serve as a protective barrier not against potential STIs, but, rather, against potential psychological infection. I don't know if this was about limiting intimacy and vulnerability to emotional connection or fear or worry about the gayness of having his cock sucked by a man, but I was struck by his calm explanation that you can get STIs through oral sex (obviously true) and that's why he insisted on condoms in this case.

Why not with me? I asked, of course, and he said that it was because he knows I'm reasonable and cautious and get tested regularly. If I could cross my eyes, I'm sure that I would have been while trying to wrap my head around this explanation.

There are plenty of good reasons to use condoms, and if one of them is that it allows you protection against ideas or intimacy that you want to avoid, that's fine, but it's probably a good idea to acknowledge to yourself that that's what you're doing. And ditto the reverse.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mt.homeport.org/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/3280

Comments

I agree that using condoms for oral sex is well within the normal range of safer sex precautions.

I also agree that NOT using condoms for oral sex is well within the normal range of safer sex precautions.

It seems to me then that "using condoms with partners who don't get tested regularly but not using them with partners who do get tested regularly" must also be within the normal range, because it's somewhere in between the two points already mentioned.

Now you could argue perhaps that this fellow had no good reason to believe you get tested regularly, and perhaps that's why you rolled your eyes. But his POLICY seems to me to be every bit as reasonable and normal as always-use-them and never-use-them are.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Contact

Feeling clueless?

email ClueChick

RSS

Cluechick wants you to be able to get clues in a variety of ways:

Atom
Livejournal: cluechick_feed
RSS 2.0
Newsgator
Yahoo!

Blogroll

Sponsor

Recent Comments

David in Chicago said: You've been missed, but never [...]
GreyDuck said: I've enjoyed your work here en [...]
Clay said: While some of your hookup post [...]
Ellie said: I'm still listening and would [...]
Zachary Gray said: RSS is great for sporadic blog [...]
sauergeek said: I would be interested in the e [...]
Rosie said: Please, the expanded focus wou [...]
Uvida Vestimenta said: Write about whatever you want. [...]
Steven said: Count me among the scores of p [...]
Ellie said: Please advise?! Wow. [...]

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.33