« February 2007 | Main | April 2007 »

March 29, 2007

I need to expand my vocabulary

I need a new word to replace "lover". Or, not to replace it, but to allow for more specificity in the description. I can use "lover" to refer to the guy I've been not-infrequently fucking for the last year, who I also enjoy spending time with outside of the bedroom and even sometimes out in public. I can also use "lover" to refer to the guy who I see every 3-4 months only for sex and for conversation between bouts of sex. And I can use "lover" to talk about the guy I fucked once and may fuck again someday... But it only really feels right for the first.

I'd really like to call the other two something else. But I know people will get the wrong idea if I call someone my "fucker". What terms to you use?

March 17, 2007

Jerky responses to personal ads abound

I often wonder why guys even bother to respond to my personal ads. I assume that they send the same email to every ad they think is even possibly real, but these responses are so ridiculous, lame, or offensive that the guy is assuring a non-response right out of the box. And I'm not just talking about the guys who say, "If your real write me back!" At least those are hopeful but clueless. I'm thinking about responses like this one:

Drop the bull-shit bitch.... If you want to get fucked so hard that you wont walk straight for a week, and your shit will be falling out of your asshole for another week... Send me your picture and phone-number right-now...

No guy thinks that's an appealing image, right? So he's obviously writing the email to get his aggressive, jerky rocks off. What a waste.

March 5, 2007

Who is this ClueChick character, anyway?

I had a unique experience recently, which has led to a (very minor, but somewhat interesting) crisis of identity: For the first time, to my knowledge, someone recognized one of my CL ads as being written by ClueChick. Or, rather, as being written by the same person who writes ClueChick, which, as you may know, happens to be me.

Now, I've had a couple of friends recognize ads I've posted as being written by me, which has led to entertaining email exchanges, and I've had people who know me recognize my writing tone and say, "Heeeey, aren't you ClueChick?" But I've never had a stranger pick it up from an ad and connect it to this blog -- at least not that anyone's said to me.

I generally think of identity information about CC flowing in one direction. Lots of my friends know I write this blog (*wave*), and several other people who know me have made the connection (*wave*), and that has never struck me as odd. I don't do anything to disguise my voice, after all. But I tend to think of it being harder for someone to go from reading CC to knowing me in real life, which is largely true.

In fact, of course, ClueChick is an imaginary person. When I'm talking to my friends about the blog, I usually refer to CC in the third person, because she's obviously cooler and sexier than I am, and while I tend to walk around with a bit of a swelled head, that can only go so far. CC, on the other hand, is pretty much totally great, and there's no need for her to restrain her ego.

But what happens when someone who "knows" ClueChick meets the real me? At this point, I don't normally get nerves about meeting someone, but in this case, I totally did. Do I have to live up to CC levels of sexy and cool? That's obviously impossible, so what can I do instead? And who is this ClueChick person, anyway?

I don't really have any answers, yet.

Contact

Feeling clueless?

email ClueChick

RSS

Cluechick wants you to be able to get clues in a variety of ways:

Atom
Livejournal: cluechick_feed
RSS 2.0
Newsgator
Yahoo!

Sponsor

Recent Comments

Misty said: Whenever I get a response like [...]
ClueChick said: You may be onto something, Tam [...]
Tammer Saleh said: I'm gonna go out on a limb her [...]
Secnarf047 said: All you need is the first thir [...]
ClueChick said: That's better than I did, Josh [...]
Josh said: I'm impressed I got 1/3 of the [...]
Tim said: I recently articulated to myse [...]
Jesse said: I've actually wondered about t [...]
pir said: There have been a few attempts [...]
Secnarf047 said: That would be too easy. Also, [...]

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.